Tucker, a Weymouth merchant, whose father, a merchant adventurer of Weymouth, was imprisoned as a Quaker in 1665,
for the people there to see that Mr. Tucker cannot dispose of everything in the town as he is daily persuading them that he can and consequently has his principal sway there by being thought to have it alone. For in short that consideration and the Portland stone are what support his power there—personally he is not popular and the people want but a small gleam of encouragement to revolt.
The letter added:
Mr. Tucker is and has been long dangerously ill and by what I know of his infirmities rheumatism palsy and dropsy cannot live long.
L. Chaplain to Sir Robt. Walpole, 4 Dec. 1733, Cholmondeley (Houghton) mss.
He and his son, John, who was also returned for Weymouth and Melcombe Regis in 1735, were among the five ‘friends’ whom Walpole asked Dodington to speak to about the opposition motion of 22 Feb. 1737 for an increase in the allowance of the Prince of Wales. After the division, in which, led by Dodington, they all voted with the Government against the motion, Dodington told Walpole that ‘the connexion between these gentlemen and me was such that we should not have differed in opinion’, if he had decided to vote for the motion.
