The Gawdy family of West Harling had resided at Bardwell Hall since the mid-sixteenth century. Gawdy remained there until he was 16, when, after an affair with a serving maid named Mistress Havers,
I bought him his clothes, hat, sword and other such necessaries as he wanted. I have been careful to save somewhat, not to spend one penny extraordinary. I never brought him into ill company; neither was he ever from me. In all truth I do not doubt but that he will do very well and make an honest man if he may meet with a worthy wife.
Letters of Philip Gawdy ed. I.H. Jeayes, 160.
Philip took Gawdy to see the lions in the Tower, and the tombs at Westminster, and promised to take him to ‘my Lo[rd] Mayor’s shows and pageants’, but he could not persuade him to write to his father.
Following his father’s death in 1606, Gawdy inherited substantial properties in Norfolk.
Although he travelled frequently to London, Gawdy spent most of his time at Harling. Mainly devoted to foldcourse sheep farming, the estate generated an annual income of approximately £600 and was convenient for the markets at Bury St. Edmunds and Thetford. Gawdy’s household accounts for the 1630s show that his income from all his properties stood at just over £1,000 p.a.
Gawdy was only 16 when his father died, and therefore could not replace him as Member for Thetford at the ensuing by-election. However, in 1614 he was comfortably elected for Thetford’s second place, obtaining 16 of the 24 votes available.
In the last Jacobean Parliament Gawdy served as the senior Thetford Member with his close friend, Dru Drury.
In 1626 Gawdy was again the junior burgess for Thetford.
Gawdy was pricked as sheriff in 1627 and so was unable to sit in 1628-9. However, his younger brother Sir Charles, who was desperate to avoid his creditors, begged him for his support. Protesting that he had ‘a great desire’ to be of the Parliament, he added that ‘I know nobody can make better means to Thetford than yourself’.
Despite his length of service, Gawdy made no recorded speeches in any of the early Stuart parliaments. Moreover, he was named to just one legislative committee, concerned with the restitution of possession by magistrates (24 Mar. 1621), and a conference with the Lords on the informers bill (1 Dec. 1621).
