Liveley was born into a markedly academic environment. His father was a distinguished biblical scholar, serving as Regius professor of Hebrew at Cambridge for 30 years, while his maternal grandfather held a chair in medicine at the same university. Educated at his father’s old college, Trinity, Liveley subsequently entered the service of Richard Neile, one of the most prominent and controversial anti-Calvinists in the early Stuart Church. Employed as Neile’s secretary at Durham, he was also placed in charge of the castle there, the bishop’s official residence. From 1620 Neile’s duties included supervision of the rebuilding of Berwick-upon-Tweed’s bridge, and within two years Liveley was acting as the bishop’s agent on this government-funded project. On at least four occasions between 1622 and 1625, he and Sir Robert Jackson*, a Berwick alderman, were entrusted with collecting substantial sums of money procured by Neile from the Exchequer.
In January 1624 Liveley was returned to the Commons as Berwick’s junior Member, again in partnership with Jackson. It is unclear whether he was nominated by Neile, or simply approached by the borough. He received no wages for this service, and apparently took his oath as a freeman in London. Liveley was not recorded as speaking, but was named to five legislative committees, whose subjects included the office of clerk of the market, and the nuisance caused by brewhouses in London and Westminster (14 Apr. and 19 May). He predictably took a particular interest in the bill to enfranchise county Durham (25 Mar.), attending both meetings of its committee. On 12 Apr. he was appointed to help present to the Commons the names of recusants in the same county.
Berwick’s corporation apparently offered Liveley a seat in 1626, but it was not until 1628 that he again agreed to represent the borough. On this occasion he was also deputed to swear in his fellow Member, Sir Edmund Sawyer, as a Berwick freeman.
Although Liveley remained in Neile’s service after the bishop’s translation to Winchester diocese in 1628, and then to the archdiocese of York four years later, he retained some contact with the Durham area through his elder brother John, who held the benefice of Kelloe. Indeed, he acted on John’s behalf in 1634 during a tithe dispute with Sir Henry Vane*.
