Jones was presumably destined for a legal career from an early age, as he and his brother William† were granted a reversion of the offices of prothonotary and clerk of the Crown for Denbigh and Montgomery in 1606, which they eventually relinquished 30 years later, shortly before the death of the incumbent, Sir Peter Mutton*.
Probably because of his London address, it was Charles rather than his elder brother Griffith who was returned to Parliament on the family interest at Beaumaris from 1624. He should not be confused with Sir Charles Jones of Treowen, Monmouthshire, who was named to the Commons’ list of recusant officeholders in 1624 because of his wife’s Catholicism. Although he left no trace on the records of the 1624 session, Jones signed the petition organized by Sir Eubule Thelwall* against (Sir) Richard Wynn’s* attempt to secure a farm of Welsh greenwax fines.
In August 1625 Jones was joined in the Commons by his brother Robert, but as the more experienced man, it was probably Charles who secured leave of absence for Littleton, now his brother-in-law, who was on the assize circuit.
Though only occasionally differentiated from his brother and Richard Jones*, it was probably Charles, the experienced barrister, who was responsible for most of the activity indiscriminately attributed to ‘Mr. Jones’ during the 1628 session. Littleton chose Jones and Sir Robert Phelips to help him prepare precedents for his exposition of the Commons’ claim to freedom from imprisonment without cause shown (7 April). This led to his nomination as an observer at the joint conferences of 23 and 25 Apr., at which the Lords agreed to proceed with the Commons in securing the liberty of the subject.
As the only lawyer among the three possible namesakes, it was probably Charles Jones who was named to the committee for Lord Gerard’s jointure bill (7 May), and who reported the committee stage of the estate bill for William Morgan of Monmouthshire and the jointure bill for the son of Lord Bergavenny (Sir Henry Neville II*).
Jones played a negligible part in the 1629 session, but he did speak in the debate of 23 Feb. on the seizure of John Rolle’s* goods for non-payment of customs dues, when he supported (Sir) John Eliot’s* argument that the punishment of the customs farmers should have priority.
Jones’s career subsequently prospered: in 1632, he became Littleton’s deputy as recorder of London.
