Hawarde’s ancestors came originally from Wales. His father was a London merchant who built up an estate in Surrey, including the manor of Garston in the parish of Bletchingley, and settled at Tandridge, four miles from the borough: he received an exemplification of arms in 1592.
Hawarde must be distinguished from Sir John Hayward*, knighted in 1609, and a civil lawyer of the same name knighted in 1619. Like the latter, Hawarde was implicated in Essex’s rising, though by his own account he emerged ‘with good credit and commendation’.
Hawarde presumably owed his election at Bletchingley in 1620 to his position as a substantial local property owner and prominent member of the bench. During the Parliament he made no recorded speeches and was named to only two bill committees, both of which related to his professional interests - the removal of suits from inferior courts (20 Apr.) and the powers of the Crown in cases of intrusion (18 May).
Hawarde was re-elected at a meeting of the burgage holders of Bletchingley on 22 Jan. 1624. However, Henry Lovell, who had been elected alongside Hawarde in 1621, challenged his return, having been chosen himself at a general meeting of the inhabitants of the borough on 9 February. On 22 Mar., following a favourable report from the committee for privileges, Hawarde’s return was upheld.
During the Parliament Hawarde was named to five committees, one of which concerned a Surrey knight, Sir Francis Clarke (23 Mar.), while another dealt with the Surrey advowson of Sutton (7 May). The remaining committees concerned a naturalization bill (15 Apr.), a bill to relieve London clothworkers (15 Apr.), and a bill to facilitate the recovery of debts (17 Apr.).
Hawarde drew up his will in July 1630. He excluded his ‘undutiful and unthrifty’ son Humphrey ‘from all colour of ever challenging any part of my real or personal estate’, the greater part of which was to pass to his ‘religious and honest’ second son. His eldest daughter was to have £40 a year, and the six surviving daughters of his second marriage were each to have £500. His will was proved on 11 Feb. 1631, which means that the date of death given in the inquisition (not held until November 1632), 1 Mar., must be a mistake. His son Sir William attended the king at Oxford during the Civil War, and was returned for Bletchingley in 1661.
