This Member’s originally Scottish family moved from Durham to Ireland in the seventeenth century, his great-grandfather Samuel Trotter being a dealer in skins and wools. His grandfather, John (?1698-1771) of Downpatrick, was agent to Lord de Clifford, which perhaps explains why one of his names was Southwell. His father, who married on 20 Dec. 1771, died on 8 July 1777, leaving him many houses in Downpatrick by his will, which was proved the following year; he was described by the resident diarist Aynsworth Pilson as a ‘sensible good sort of man’, who despite his ‘considerable vanity’ had ‘an understanding very superior to his son and grandson who afterwards figured in Downpatrick’. His mother, whose father had been Member for Lisburn, 1759-76, remarried in 1792, to James Cumine of Killough, but died the same year. Pilson later recorded that the young Trotter ‘was greatly indulged by his mother, which, superadded to a temper naturally self-willed, contributed much to his unhappiness through life’.
Having lost his seat in 1807 and been defeated in 1815 and 1818, Ruthven offered again for Downpatrick at the general election of 1820, when the sitting Member withdrew. At the county election there he urged the local magistrates to maintain order and a few days later, despite thinking himself certain of success, he was defeated in the borough by his Tory opponent, John Waring Maxwell.
On Waring Maxwell’s withdrawal at the general election of 1830, Ruthven, who claimed to be unconnected with any party, offered again for Downpatrick and was returned unopposed, described as a ‘public spirited gentleman’ of ‘most independent and uncompromising principles’.
In a maiden speech, 3 Nov. 1830, he denied that Ireland sought independence from Britain. He objected to Hume’s call for reducing army widows’ pensions, 5 Nov., and, although usually a supporter of reduced expenditure and taxation, he on various later occasions opposed false economies. As in the debate on the state of the labouring classes, 9 Nov., he frequently advocated the extension of proposed measures to Ireland. He spoke and voted for repealing the Irish Subletting Act, 11 Nov., and was in the majority against ministers on the civil list, which led to their resignation, 15 Nov. He defended the Irish clergy, 18 Nov., and magistracy, 15, 23 Dec., and took a moderate stance on slavery, advocating compensation for planters, 23 Nov., 15 Dec., and on agricultural distress, opposing repeal of the corn laws, 2, 7, 17 Dec. He praised O’Connell’s support for parliamentary reform, 9 Dec., but stated his disagreement with him over repeal of the Union that day and on the 11th. On 17 Dec. 1831 he engaged in the first of what became a long series of rancorous squabbles. He helped to secure the petition for radical reform at the Down meeting, 20 Jan. 1831, and signed the requisition for the county gathering against repeal of the Union in March, when he unsuccessfully applied to the new prime minister, Lord Grey, for the colonelcy of the Down militia.
Ruthven praised the address for promising to tackle Irish distress, 22 June, but criticized the use of molasses in British distilleries as depreciating the work of Irish labourers, 30 June, 26 July 1831. He divided for the second reading of the reintroduced reform bill, 6 July, at least twice against adjourning proceedings on it, 12 July, and thereafter generally for its details in committee, though he cast wayward votes for postponing consideration of the partial disfranchisement of Chippenham, 27 July, against the division of counties, 11 Aug., and for Lord Chandos’s amendment to enfranchise £50 tenants-at-will, 18 Aug. He opposed the continuation of the grant to the Kildare Place Society, 18 July, when he had something to say on the role of the yeomanry in Orange processions, and the following day he defended the Maynooth grant. He justified the respectability, if not the sentiments, of the Belfast petition for repeal of the Union, 20 July. He was listed in the minorities for swearing the original Dublin election committee, 29 July, and against issuing a new writ, 8 Aug., but in government majorities in the two divisions on the controversy, 23 Aug. He called for the introduction of a form of poor laws to Ireland, 10 Aug., and voted for this, 29 Aug. On 11 Aug. he divided for printing the Waterford petition for disarming the Irish yeomanry, which he argued would relieve tension, 15, 26 Aug. He favoured the appointment of lord lieutenants in Irish counties, 15, 20 Aug., but was occasionally hostile to ministers, for instance in the committee of supply, 31 Aug. On 2 Sept. he proposed legalizing Catholic marriages (he introduced an abortive bill on this the following session), and he suggested alterations to the Irish administration of justice bill, 2, 15 Sept. He voted for the third reading, 19 Sept., and passage of the reform bill, 21 Sept., and for the second reading of the Scottish bill, 23 Sept. He clashed with Bateson, Member for County Londonderry, 26 Sept., and Castlereagh, 27 Sept., and was angered by the House’s refusal to hear him, 4 Oct. He divided for Lord Ebrington’s confidence motion, 10 Oct., and spoke generally for reform, 12, 17, 18 Oct. He was a teller for the minority against the ecclesiastical courts bill, 14 Oct. 1831.
Having missed the division on the second reading of the revised reform bill, 17 Dec. 1831, he called for an increase of Irish Members and defended the £5 householder franchise, 19 Jan. 1832, when he condemned the Union. He divided for the committal of the reform bill, 20 Jan., 20 Feb., steadily for its details and for the third reading, 22 Mar. He complained about the partisan composition of the select committee on Irish tithes, 23 Jan., when he voted for the vestry bill, but urged his countrymen not to react violently against the ministerial plan for Irish education, 26 Jan., 13 Feb. He sided with opposition against the Russian-Dutch loan, 26 Jan., and for inquiry into distress in the glove trade, 31 Jan., but with ministers against the production of information on Portugal, 9 Feb. He initially suggested that the anatomy bill should be extended to Ireland, 6 Feb., but voted for recommitting it, 27 Feb., and expressed his horror of it, 16 Mar., 11 Apr., 11 May. He declared for the total abolition of Irish tithes, 8 Feb., and gave guarded support to the Irish subletting bill, 20 Feb., and juries bill, 22, 28 Feb., when his amendment for juries in criminal cases to be chosen by ballot was negatived. He divided to postpone debate on Irish tithes, 8 Mar., and secured an adjournment on this, 13 Mar., presenting hostile petitions, 23, 30 Mar., 14 May. He led the protests against government’s interim report on the subject, 27 Mar., when he was teller for the minority for his amendment to the first resolution for redistributing church revenues, and argued that conciliation not enforcement was the remedy for disorder in Ireland, 31 Mar. Having divided against the second and fourth resolutions, 27, 30 Mar., he moved (and was a teller for) the unsuccessful wrecking amendment against the second reading of the Irish arrears of tithes bill, 6 Apr., and again raised objections to it, 9, 16 Apr. He spoke for the ministerial education plan, 16 Apr., and, as he had promised its instigator Sharman Crawford, brought up the favourable Bangor petition, 18 Apr.
The Protestant Ruthven, who had for many months been cultivating a following in Dublin, was surprisingly adopted as a candidate by the National Political Union there after he had pledged himself to advocate repeal of the Union, and he was elected as a Repealer with O’Connell at the general election of 1832.
