Shirley’s father, a grandson of the 1st Earl Ferrers (1650-1717), married on 3 July 1781 the daughter of a London physician, whose grandfather was the scholar and clergyman William Wollaston (1659-1724). In 1793 he was appointed sheriff of Warwickshire, where he had substantial property in Lower and Upper Ettington (otherwise Eatington). Evelyn, the third of 14 children, was baptized in Lower Ettington on 12 June 1788.
Like his father before him, Shirley employed an agent to manage his large estate in the western half of the barony of Farney in Monaghan. Although it was reported as early as 1822 that he ‘positively intends setting up for the county’, it was not until he was obliged to fill the office of sheriff there in 1824 that he decided to bolster his interest and have his many Catholic tenants registered. Having rented a house at Coolderry, he set about constructing a new family mansion at Lough Fea, and thereafter usually resided in Ireland during the summer.
According to his diary, Shirley took his seat on 21 Nov. 1826 and voted for the first time, 19 Feb. 1827, in favour of the duke of Clarence’s grant and the army estimates. Although he was present to hear the ‘Catholic question discussed’, 5 Mar., he apparently missed the division the following day.
Shirley began his diary for 1830 with the pious comment, typical of his Evangelical outlook, that ‘another year is commenced. God in his mercy grant that I may spend it better than the last’. However, as in other years, many of the dates which headed the daily entries were circled by him, and typical of his elliptical notes, which hint at some private and enduring cause of shame, was one which read: ‘Without any efforts to resist, gave way as usual; made no trial of strength. Let me determine to resist and at all events do not give up without some resistance and I hope of determined resistance’.
Apparently described by Daniel O’Connell* as ‘a mongrel - half English, half Irish, and whenever he gives a vote as giving a slavish one’, Shirley initially offered again at the ensuing general election, when he condemned reform as a ‘violation of vested rights and chartered privileges’ in his Monaghan address; he also signed the Warwickshire anti-reform declaration. Yet he soon withdrew in the face of a coalition between Westenra and Blayney, who were returned unopposed, ostensibly in order to preserve the peace of the county.
