Brought before king’s bench for judgement, 17 Nov. 1819, after being found guilty of electoral bribery at Penryn, ‘Lawyer’ Swann made a rambling speech in which he admitted that proven corruption warranted ‘exemplary’ punishment, but claimed that ‘in Parliament he had ever acted as a conscientious, independent man, unshackled by ministerial or other influence, and was therefore unlikely to be guilty of wilful or corrupt bribery’. He was sentenced to a year in the Marshalsea.
He avows himself to be compiling a history of all transactions involving jobbery or profligacy of any kind as connected with Parliaments as well as the conduct of the royal family in pecuniary matters, etc., which he means to publish or (we may conclude) to use as a means of extorting money. He says he is sure of his election for Penryn [at the forthcoming general election] without expending a shilling!
NLI, Vesey Fitzgerald letterbks. 7858, pp. 169-70.
His renewed candidature for Penryn was promoted by his many friends in the borough, where he had built up a strong interest, partly through his success in securing a contract for the use of local granite in the construction of the new Waterloo Bridge.
He continued his practice of giving general support to the government of the day, while displaying his independence on certain occasions. He voted in defence of the Liverpool ministry’s conduct towards Queen Caroline, 6 Feb., and paired against Catholic relief, 28 Feb. 1821. He divided for Russell’s parliamentary reform motion, 9 May, and was in small minorities against including arrears in the grant to the duke of Clarence, 8, 29 June. He was a majority teller for adjourning the debate on the Newington select vestry bill, 16 May 1821. As the owner through marriage of the Oxford plantation in Jamaica, he attended general meetings of the West India interest in 1822 and 1823.
He died in April 1824, having previously signified his intention of vacating his seat.
