Skipwith, a descendant through his mother (d. 1779), of the American Indian Princess Pocahontas, was born and raised in Virginia, where Sir Grey Skipwith, the 3rd baronet of Prestwould, Leicestershire, had settled after selling his English property to a follower of Cromwell in 1652. His father, a loyalist during the American War of Independence, bequeathed his Virginia estates to his younger sons, for Skipwith, his successor in the baronetcy, was already provided for as heir apparent to their childless kinsman Sir Thomas Skipwith (d. 1790), the 4th and last baronet of Newbold Pacey Hall, south of Warwick (the 1769-80 county Member), who had financed his English education.
I have never until lately exhibited myself as a reformer, because, I confess, I could formerly see no hopes of success. I, however, embraced the first opportunity of expressing my sentiments, when I considered their expression might prove effectual ... My only fear is, that in attending to business connected with the great town of Birmingham, my abilities will not be equal to my zeal.
Coventry Mercury, 8 May 1831.
He was returned unopposed.
Acting with Lawley, Skipwith, who joined Brooks’s, 16 July, voted for the reintroduced reform bill at its second reading, 6 July, and generally for its details, but against the total disfranchisement of Downton, 21 July 1831. His vote for Lord Chandos’s clause for enfranchising £50 tenants-at-will, 18 Aug., reflected local opinion. He divided for the bill at its third reading, 19 Sept., and passage, 21 Sept., for the second reading of the Scottish measure, 23 Sept., and for Lord Ebrington’s confidence motion, 10 Oct. He had written publicly to the leader of the Birmingham Political Union, Thomas Attwood†, following the bill’s Lords’ defeat, urging moderation and continued support for the Grey ministry, and the ensuing county meeting commended him for doing so, 8 Nov.
Attending to constituency business, he presented and endorsed a petition criticizing the laws affecting debtors, 12 Oct. 1831, and brought up others on behalf of the distressed ribbon weavers, 28 Feb., and in favour of the Maynooth grant, 21 May, and the factory bill, 17 July 1832. His main concern was the fate of the beleaguered London-Birmingham railway bill. He brought up favourable petitions, 28 Feb., 13 Apr., and his speeches on 28 Feb., when he and Lawley thwarted attempts to kill the bill and carried its second reading by 125-40, reflected his knowledge of the statutory procedures for local bills and of their implementation in this instance. Addressing the railway’s wealthy promoters at the Thatched House Tavern, 13 July, he extolled the scheme’s merits and denounced the Tory peers who opposed it. When the Lords returned the bill amended, 17 July 1832, he recommended accepting it in a persuasive speech, which drew heavily on the engineer Telford’s evidence to the select committee, and helped to secure its passage.
A Liberal and staunch churchman, but ‘no radical’, Skipwith moved to Newbold Pacey Hall in the summer of 1832 and topped the poll for Warwickshire South at the general election in December.
