Little is known of Godson’s antecedents. His father William Godson was an attorney in practice at Tenbury, Worcestershire, and in 1809 was elected one of the county coroners.
On his call to the bar in 1821 Richard Godson went the Oxford circuit. In December 1822 he completed a substantial Practical Treatise on the Law of Patents for Inventions and of Copyright, which was published the following year. At the Worcester Michaelmas sessions of 1830 he defended ten Kidderminster carpet-weavers brought to trial for their part in recent riots in the town. He secured several acquittals and reductions of charges, though he made it clear at the close that he did not condone their conduct, which had been ‘of the most illegal description’. The weavers of Kidderminster subsequently presented him with a handsome hearth rug as a token of their appreciation of his efforts.
I scorn the idea of having property in my fellow subjects. The government may declare the black population free upon any conditions that may be thought reasonable; I only ask that the lives of the white people, resident on the islands, may be protected. I shall therefore vote for an emancipation which will protect our colonial possessions, and the best emancipator is the man who is willing to sacrifice his own interests.
He wanted reform of the criminal code to produce ‘cheap and good law, but no distressing imprisonments’.
Godson, who never joined Brooks’s, rose with self-confessed ‘fear and trembling’ in the debate on the second reading of the reintroduced reform bill, 5 July 1831. He had no regrets about having given on the hustings a so-called ‘unconstitutional pledge’ to support the whole bill: ‘we will stick to this bill, and the whole of this bill; because, if we do not carry this reform, we shall have no reform at all’. He forecast that the benefits of the measure would be ‘the removal of discontent and disaffection, and the establishment of confidence in the legislature’. He voted for it next day, and against the adjournment, 12 July. Two days later he was given leave to go the circuit, which prevented him from supporting the reform bill in committee for five weeks, though he arranged a pair for the divisions of 26, 28 July, 3, 5 Aug., and probably for others. He was present to divide with ministers on details of the bill, 17, 18, 20 Aug., 2 Sept. On 24 Aug. he presented a petition from the inhabitants of St. Albans for reduction of the borough householders’ voting qualification from £10 to £5; it was alleged by his enemies that the petition was ‘a hole and corner affair’.
If they are worth having, they must be treated in a kindlier spirit, and the planters must be enabled to cultivate their estates, not less for their own sakes than for the sake of the slaves themselves, whose emancipation, nevertheless, I should be glad to see.
That day he was given a week’s leave to attend the quarter sessions. He was initially listed among reformers absent from the division on the Russian-Dutch loan, 12 July 1832; but it was subsequently reported that he had voted in the opposition minority.
Godson published a Supplement to his book on the law of patents in late 1832; in the preface (p. iv) he expressed the hope that next session an effort would be made to create ‘a good code of laws for the better protection of inventions’. There was some notion in July that he might stand for both St. Albans and Kidderminster at the general election, but he opted for the latter alone, and was narrowly returned there in December 1832 after a contest with a fellow reformer.
