Close kinship ties with the anti-Unionist John Foster*, his legal training and his father’s mercantile wealth and prominence in the management of the Bank of Ireland and in insurance had provided Dick with the means of entering politics as a Member of the Dublin and Westminster Parliaments at an early age. However, his controversial resignation as Member for Cashel in March 1809 on a point of honour had marginalized him, and his opulent political dinners, patronage of the Beafsteak Club, ‘carroty’ hair and dandified old fashioned dress left him prey to the jibes of the courtesan Harriette Wilson and others who thought him ‘vilely shabby’ and disliked him.
He voted against Catholic relief, 6 Mar., and for the duke of Clarence’s annuity bill, 16 Mar., but in the minority for inquiry into chancery delays, 5 Apr. 1827. He was fortunate to survive a shooting incident at Hertford’s Sudbourne estate in January 1828, when his faulty gun discharged, wounding his Orford colleague Sir Henry Frederick Cooke and two boys.
The ministry classified him as one of the ‘violent Ultras’ and he divided against them when they were brought down on the civil list, 15 Nov. 1830. He presented a Maldon anti-slavery petition, 20 Dec., and vainly tried to have one from Sir Harcourt Lees for repeal of the Act of Abjuration printed, 21, 23 Dec., but lost the division on the latter day, when he was a minority teller, by 45-4. He made minor interventions on the management of the vacancy occasioned by the appointment of a new clerk of the ordnance, 23 Dec., and on a master in chancery’s mode of contact with both Houses, 23 Dec., and criticized the O’Gorman Mahon for failing to attend when Hume ordered ‘returns relating to the office of the recorder of Dublin’, 23 Dec. 1830. He voted against the second reading of the Grey ministry’s reform bill, which proposed making Maldon a single Member constituency, 22 Mar., and for Gascoyne’s wrecking amendment, 19 Apr. 1831. His return at the ensuing general election was unopposed.
A bachelor of 45, with £25,000 a year ... amorous of Miss Jervis, Lord St. Vincent’s daughter ... a pretty little girl, just 18, full of life and fun ... She opened all Dick’s drawers, read his letters, asked the servants what pictures there were in the frames behind the green curtains, and turned the room topsy turvey.
Hatherton diary, 20, 24 Nov. 1831.
He voted against the revised reform bill at its second reading, 17 Dec. 1831, and against restricting certain borough polls to a single day, 15 Feb., the enfranchisement of Tower Hamlets, 28 Feb., and the third reading, 22 Mar. 1832. His support on 7 Feb. for Barrett Lennard’s unsuccessful bid to add ‘freedom by marriage with the daughter of a freeman’ to the categories recognized under the bill caused The Times to repeat its claim that Dick, the ‘ladies’ favourite’, had boosted his 1826 vote by financing arranged marriages in Maldon. (The issue would again haunt his 1848 canvass at Aylesbury, where he was denounced as ‘a man whose grandest achievement during a long public life was the manufacture of a few starched husbands for a few despairing old maids’.)
Aligning with the West Indian spokesman William Burge and the opposition radicals, Dick voted in small minorities to reduce public salaries to 1797 levels, 30 June, to halve the grant to the Society for the Propagation of the Gospels in the colonies, 25 July, and against compensating Lecesne and Escoffery for their removal from Jamaica, 21 Aug. 1831. He voted for inquiry into the feasibility of renewing the Sugar Refining Act without damaging West Indian interests, 12 Sept., but it is unclear whether he was acting in defence of the planters, to oppose ministers or as the ‘enemy to slavery’ which he purported to be during his canvass at the 1832 general election. (He subsequently complained that the abolition bills were ‘not gradual enough’ to warrant his support.)
Dick’s investment in Maldon, which he contested on ten occasions between 1826 and 1854, reputedly cost him nearly £30,000 and exposed him in 1853 to the scrutiny of an election inquiry. Defeated there in 1847, 1852 and 1854, he sat for Aylesbury as a Protectionist, 1848-52.
