The senior Guards officer and yeomanry commander Lord Frederick Bentinck, as he was generally known, was one of the few members of the family connection originally built up by his late father, the prime minister, who still held a seat in Parliament by the start of this period.
He was an infrequent voter and made no recorded speeches during this period. He divided with ministers against economies in the collection of taxes, 7 July 1820, and in defence of their conduct towards Queen Caroline, 6 Feb. 1821. He voted against Catholic claims, 28 Feb. 1821, and Canning’s bill to allow Catholic peers to sit in the Lords, 30 Apr. 1822. Surprisingly, he was in the minority for Lambton’s parliamentary reform motion, 18 Apr. 1821, but he voted against alteration of the Scottish representative system, 2 June 1823. He voted against economies, 27 June 1821, and more extensive tax reductions to relieve distress, 11 Feb. 1822. He divided with ministers on Irish tithes, 19 June, and the Canada bill, 18 July 1822, and against inquiries into the legal proceedings against the Dublin Orange rioters, 22 Apr., chancery administration, 7 June, and the currency, 12 June 1823. In January 1824 he vacated Weobley, presumably by agreement with Bath, who brought in his second son, and, at the invitation of the duke of Wellington, the master general of the ordnance, he accepted an available seat on that department’s interest at Queenborough, provided it would not cost more than £2,000 or £3,000, two months later.
the opinion here is, that the call will certainly not be enforced. In consequence of this protracted debate, it is out of the question. Government cannot want their friends up because, if they did, they would have importuned us to have come up, which they have had time and opportunities without end to have done.
Portland mss PwK 441.
He voted against Catholic claims, 1 Mar., paired against the second reading of the relief bill, 21 Apr., and voted against its third reading, 10 May; he divided against the Irish franchise bill, 26 Apr. He voted for the duke of Cumberland’s annuity, 2, 6, 10 June 1825.
In March 1825 Cavendish Bentinck was considered by his wife’s family for the expected vacancy at Carlisle during the final illness of Sir James Graham of Kirkstall; but his brother-in-law Lord Lowther* wrote that ‘his constituents are refractory at the moment and the government would lose a seat at Queenborough’.
