The pedigree of the Wymondeswold family, which seems to have hailed from Wymeswold in north Leicestershire, can only be speculatively reconstructed, but the probability is that the MP was the younger brother of the well-connected John Wymondeswold.
It was, however, William who came to be more intimately concerned in the town’s day to day affairs. The first reference to him dates from Michaelmas term 1420, when he personally appeared in the court of King’s bench to sue men of Foxton and Great Bowden, some miles to the south-east of Leicester, for trespass.
No sooner had Wymondeswold become established in Leicester than he became involved in a dispute with the town’s collegiate church of St. Mary in the Newarke. On 27 Nov. 1424 he entered into a recognizance in £20 to the King that he would behave well towards them until the next sessions in the town, when he would find security of the peace before the j.p.s or else give himself up for imprisonment.
After this violent interlude, Wymondeswold’s career entered calmer waters. In 1439 he added to his interests outside Leicester by purchasing 50 acres in his native Wymeswold in north Leicestershire. He also had property at Scraptoft, a few miles to the east of Leicester, for in 1443 he sued a group of eight husbandmen for depasturing his grass there to the value of as much as £20.
Elected for his second term as mayor in 1452, Wymondeswold returned to Parliament on 1 Mar. 1453, one of only three occasions in our period when the choice of the electors fell on the serving mayor.
Wymondeswold’s career was remarkable in its variety. Although seemingly from a lesser gentry family, he developed considerable commercial interests. In his long career he was variously described as grocer, chandler, wax chandler, spicer and merchant.
Nothing is known for certain about Wymondeswold’s descendants. His putative brother John was dead by June 1452, apparently leaving a son Richard as his heir. It may thus be that John Wymondeswold, who held office as deputy porter of Leicester castle from 1453 to 1459, is to be identified as our MP’s son, but this, like all else appertaining to the family pedigree, is a matter of speculation.
