It seems likely that Wood was a son of John Wood I. As his will of 1458 reveals, John fathered two younger sons named William, one by his first wife, Alice, and the other by his second, Katherine. The will also shows that the elder of the two Williams married a lady named Joan and the younger an Elizabeth; that the younger William succeeded to property in Worcester worth £10 p.a.; and that each of them received a share of their father’s estates elsewhere in Worcestershire.
The two brothers and namesakes are first heard of in June 1443, when the Crown granted them £10 p.a. from the fee farm of Worcester for their lives in survivorship. The previous recipient of this annuity was Robert Whitgreve*, an officer of the Household, raising the possibility that the brothers were either likewise linked to the royal establishment or else had performed the Crown some service deserving of this far from insignificant reward.
Distinguishing between the Williams was also sometimes difficult for their contemporaries. Late in Henry VI’s reign the elder was sued for debt by the London goldsmith, John Amadas, but he failed to answer the suit and was outlawed. In due course, the authorities ordered John Marteyn, escheator of Worcestershire in 1464-5, to seize his goods and chattels, but Marteyn mistakenly impounded the possessions of the younger William, who petitioned the Crown for redress. In May 1465 the King ordered Marteyn to investigate and on the following 16 Oct. a jury confirmed the truth of the petition but declared itself ignorant as to what goods and chattels the elder William had owned at the time of his outlawry.
Nothing more is heard of either William after this date, although it is likely that Richard Wood of Worcester, who in 1494 stood accused of having participated in a riot, was one of their relatives.
