A Portsman of Rye by 1430, in the years that followed Sutton could claim exemption from taxation on his moveable goods outside the liberty, at Hope and Wivelridge in Sussex.
Sutton was frequently asked to witness deeds in Rye,
In the summer of 1448 Thomas Stoughton was put forward as Rye’s nominee as bailiff at Yarmouth, only to be rejected by the delegates from the other Ports because his normal place of residence was London. Accordingly, Rye was told to choose between three other nominees, of whom Sutton was one, although it is not known whether he was selected.
All this might imply that Sutton’s own behaviour was unimpeachable. But he was not always law-abiding – indeed, appears to have had a violent temperament. In 1449 he had been in a brawl in which he struck the chest of one ‘Robert’ with his fist, whereupon the injured man drew a two-handed sword out of its sheath. This offence only received local attention; potentially much more serious was Sutton’s indictment before the justices of oyer and terminer holding sessions at Chichester in July 1451. The justices, who were investigating felonies committed during and after Cade’s rebellion in the previous year, were informed that on 1 Aug. 1450 Sutton had broken into property belonging to the vicar of Rye’s parish church, and had stolen grain worth 40 marks, but neither the background to the alleged offence nor the consequences of the charge are revealed. A few years later Sutton fell out with Robert Onewyn, like him one of the leading townsmen of Rye. On 14 Mar. 1456 both were brought to the mayor’s court and bound over in £30 to keep the peace, while Onewyn also had to undertake to behave peaceably towards two of Sutton’s kinsmen. Their bonds were to be forfeit if there was any revival of the ‘debate quarell or stryff of sawte’ between them. Onewyn was later fined 12d. for drawing a dagger against Sutton’s younger namesake at a local stables.
Although Sutton had not been returned to Parliament after 1442, he maintained an association with Master John Faukes, the clerk of the Parliaments, and the latter’s subordinate Thomas Bayen*, the clerk of the Commons. This is not surprising in the case of the latter, who lived at Rye, but is more unexpected with regard to Faukes, whom he joined in Trinity term 1459 in bringing a suit for debt in the court of common pleas against Henry Auger esquire and a husbandman of Newenden, Kent, the farmers of the hospital of St. Bartholomew at Rye.
Thereafter it is not always easy to distinguish the MP’s activities from those of his younger namesake, who had been engaged in similar activities for the previous 13 years.
