Rodes represented the borough of Newcastle-upon-Tyne in at least eight Parliaments, making him by far the most experienced parliamentarian to represent that constituency during the fifteenth century. His career as a lawyer spanned over 50 years, and, although he seems not to have aspired to promotion to the profession’s higher ranks, he prospered in the service of both the Crown and Durham priory. He was one of two sons of John Rodes, a Newcastle merchant and lawyer who was extremely active in the administration of the town, serving several terms as mayor between 1420 and 1432 and regularly attesting the town’s parliamentary elections (the last occasion being in 1435). The family were a well-established one in the north-east and a kinsman, also named Robert, was prior of Tynemouth between 1436 and 1451.
Rodes must have been a young man when he was first mentioned in the records. In Easter 1423 he appeared at the Exchequer as attorney for his father who was due to render account, as mayor of Newcastle, for the export of staple goods.
For Rodes himself the main attraction of election was the furtherance of his own career as a lawyer. Educated at Middle Temple, he had completed his readings by the mid-1430s.
Rodes’s principal clients also, not surprisingly, came from the north-east. He was particularly closely associated with the priory of Durham. By 1433 he was retained with an annual fee of £1 by Prior Wessington (d.1446), an annuity he continued to receive under Wessington’s successor, Prior Ebchester (1446-56).
In July 1441 Rodes made a further gain from his service to the Crown with appointment as controller of customs and subsidies in the port of Newcastle-upon-Tyne, and on the following 19 Sept. Prior Wessington, on the Crown’s commission, took his oath of office.
From this point in his career Rodes’s administrative activities began to diminish. He may possibly have sat in the Parliament of 1445, but it is unlikely that he sat thereafter. Further, on 18 May 1441 he had secured a lifetime exemption from appointment as mayor, sheriff or escheator, and although this did not prevent his appointment as escheator in 1442 and 1444 it may indicate his diminishing inclination to maintain a busy workload. His removal from the county bench in July 1442 is certainly consistent with such an interpretation, and although he continued to serve as customs collector until 1448, he did not hold office in the service of the Crown thereafter.
Rodes’s reduced public role left him time to divert to other projects. At some point before April 1450, for example, he embarked on a pilgrimage to Jerusalem, only to be forced to turn back by ill health when he had reached Basel.
Despite Rodes’s apparent retreat from public life, his old connexions were not forgotten: in April 1453 when Ralph, Lord Cromwell, sought to clear himself from charges that he had been implicated in the unrest of 1450 Rodes supplied testimony on his behalf. The slanderous charges against Cromwell had been made by Robert Collinson, a priest who had been confessor to John Wilkins, executed for treason in June 1452 after the duke of York’s abortive rising at Dartford. In his defence Cromwell called on his associates for evidence of Collinson’s own untrustworthiness and treasonable activities. He described how Collinson visited Newcastle-upon-Tyne and was ‘of such demeanynge and governaunce that all the people were sore sett ageyns him and had not the help be of a gentilman, j. called Robert Rodes, which of pitee gate him prevely away be boot’ fearing for the priest’s life. The testimony, we can assume, came directly from Rodes, who claimed he had been misled by Collinson into assisting a man accused of preaching seditious sermons by the rest of the town’s clergy.
After the accession of Edward IV in March 1461 there may have been some question about Rodes’s loyalty to the new regime for in the following July he entered into a recognizance for 500 marks payable to the King at Michaelmas that year. Its conditions are not known, but it might have been connected to Rodes’s involvement in the efforts by Bishop Booth of Durham to dispossess Richard Neville, earl of Warwick, of the lordship of Barnard Castle. In any case it was cancelled by letters patent in August 1464. By then he seems to have gained the new government’s trust: in the previous February he was among those commissioned to arrest shipping at Newcastle for the campaign against the Lancastrian rebels in Northumberland.
Rodes’s principal concern in the last years of his life appears to have been his spiritual welfare. Neither of his wives had brought him surviving issue, and he was thus free to dispose of the bulk of his resources in charitable purposes. In 1461 he and his second wife received a licence to found a chantry in St. Nicholas’s church, Newcastle, and in June 1466 Bishop Booth of Durham licensed him to build a chapel dedicated to St. John the Baptist in the parish church of Stanhope in Weardale. This latter foundation was to be maintained with £5 p.a. from Rodes’s manor of Wheatley, county Durham; and its chaplain was to pray for the souls not only of members of the Rodes family but also of the King, Archbishop George Neville, Bishop Booth and Elizabeth, once wife of Sir John Burcester (he had purchased a share of the manor of Benwell from her in 1446). Rodes is also known to have given money for works in the Newcastle churches of All Saints and St. Andrew, and it may be that he was responsible for the construction of the steeple of the church of St. Nicholas. There was also a cathedral chantry at Durham dedicated to Rodes and his second wife with payments being made to monks to celebrate mass there as late as 1532.
Rodes appears to have had a special devotion to St. Cuthbert: in 1447 he had presented a gold cross, containing portions of the stone from Christ’s tomb, to the saint’s shrine at Durham. The same devotion is implied in a letter he wrote to Bishop Booth on 29 Apr. 1461 requesting his absolution for false statements in an inquisition post mortem he had returned as escheator of Northumberland. This concerned the lordship of Barnard Castle, previously held by Richard Beauchamp, earl of Warwick (d.1439), and now in dispute between Booth and Richard Neville, earl of Warwick. The inquisition had stated that the lordship lay in the county of Northumberland, ‘qwarin’, Rodes went on, ‘I hurte the liberte and title of the Seynt Cutbert of Dureham, qwlyk me sore repentis’. While this was doubtless connected to Booth’s unsuccessful suits to the King to have Warwick dispossessed of the lordship, it nevertheless revealed Rodes’s commitment to Durham’s patron saint.
Rodes died on 20 Apr. 1474. An inquisition post mortem held in county Durham in the following July showed him to have been seised of the manors of Little Eden (the property of his first wife), nearby Wheatley (conveyed to him by another local man, William Thomson, in 1451 and also once of his first wife’s family), and ‘Colyerle’. His heir was named as Alice, the daughter of his dead brother, John. Before his death Rodes’s estates had been placed in the hands of his feoffees and executors, two Newcastle men John Hebburn and William Lawson, for the performance of his will.
