The chief interests in Glasgow Burghs were those of the Campbells, dukes of Argyll, and of the town council of Glasgow, then entering on a period of prosperity, based on the tobacco trade. The Members, who were expected to look after the city’s commercial interests, were either merchants, preferably with London connexions, or relations of the dukes of Argyll.
Under George I these interests united in returning Daniel Campbell, a wealthy Glasgow merchant, closely connected with the Argyll family. In 1727, having fallen out with the Glasgow corporation, he was defeated by John Blackwood, a London merchant, of Edinburgh origin, who was returned by the sheriff, though the returning officer had declared Campbell to be duly elected. On petition the Commons awarded the seat to Campbell, rejecting a motion that the merits of the election should be considered at the same time as those of the return, but giving Blackwood leave to petition on the former ground. The substance of Blackwood’s petition, presented but not dealt with in the 1728 session, together with similar petitions from three of the constituent burghs, was that at the election Campbell had received only one vote, that of one of two rival Dumbarton delegates, the other of whom, with the Glasgow and Rutherglen delegates had voted for Blackwood, Renfrew abstaining. Renewed in 1729, the petitions were referred by the Commons to the elections committee, who rejected those of the burghs on the ground that they differed in substance from the original ones.
In 1734 Campbell was succeeded by William Campbell, the Duke of Argyll’s first cousin, who so neglected his constituents that in 1741 they replaced him by Neil Buchanan, a London merchant of Glasgow origin, also attached to Argyll.
in the Campbells. The only man that can beat ’em must be a Scotch merchant, recommended from the city.
Rutherglen (1715, ’41), Glasgow (1722, ’47), Lanarkshire; Dumbarton (1727); Renfrew (1734)
Number of voters: 88
