Yorke, who described himself as ‘an uncompromising friend of the people’, took a particular interest in the poor law while Liberal MP for York, endeavouring to mitigate its harshness.
Yorke was the oldest son of Henry Redhead Yorke (1772-1813), a renowned radical political writer, and his middle name ‘Galgacus’ was one of the pseudonyms under which his father had written for the Star newspaper.
After studying at Cambridge, Yorke earned his keep as tutor to Sir John Charles Thorold, 11th bt., of Syston Park, Lincolnshire, the ward of Sir Robert Heron, of Stubton Hall, Lincolnshire. Heron recorded that Yorke ‘conducted himself in a manner to command my esteem and gratitude’.
‘Very anxious to come into Parliament’,
At the 1841 election Yorke stood as ‘an advocate of free trade’.
An extremely diligent attender at Westminster, Yorke later claimed that during parliamentary sessions he ‘devoted himself entirely and exclusively to the interests of his country, giving up all his private and social relations’ and living ‘a secluded life in the House of Commons’. One supporter suggested that he voted in at least 500 divisions in the 1841-7 Parliament.
He consistently voted for Villiers’ anti-corn law motions, and accused supporters of the sliding scale on corn of allowing ‘the greatest gambling to take place with the famishing stomachs of the people, upon the principle of this phantom of protection’, 8 July 1842. Although in 1844 he ‘coolly’ told a local deputation which asked him to attend an Anti-Corn Law League meeting that ‘he repudiated the League’,
Yorke consistently opposed the poor law amendment bill at all stages in 1842 and supported efforts to modify the measure, such as allowing guardians to grant outdoor relief, 20 July 1842. He was in the minorities for John Fielden’s anti-poor law motion, 19 July 1842, and John Walter’s motion that the poor laws be reconstructed to make them ‘conformable to Christianity, sound policy, and the ancient Constitution’, 23 Feb. 1843. The poor law also prompted the majority of Yorke’s intermittent and usually brief contributions to debate. His first intervention was to ask Peel whether it would possible to add a clause prohibiting ‘indiscriminate separation of man and wife’ in the workhouse to the amendment bill, 20 Sept. 1841. His attempt the following week to secure this change, urging that people should not be punished for their poverty, was defeated by 36 votes to 187, with Yorke as a minority teller, 27 Sept. 1841. The following day, impervious to cries of ‘Yorke, you are not wanted’, he endorsed giving poor law guardians the power to grant immediate relief in ‘cases of pressing misery’. In common with other opponents of the poor law, he was keen that Gilbert’s Unions retain their separate existence, 17 Mar. 1842.
After a period of ill health which reduced his contributions in the 1843 session, he resumed his defence of Gilbert’s Unions, 30 May 1844, and voted in the minority for their retention, 18 July 1844.
The second theme on which Yorke intermittently spoke was the need to tackle bribery and corruption. Protesting about the ‘most disgusting’ bribery at the 1841 election, 21 Apr. 1842, he also voiced his support for abolishing the property qualification for MPs, but expressed doubts about annual Parliaments. His assertion that ‘all sides of the House’ were ‘generally tainted’ with corruption in 1841 prompted William Ferrand to repeat rumours that Yorke ‘had spent several thousands of pounds in corrupting’ York’s electors. Yorke rebutted this, offering to take the Chiltern Hundreds immediately if it would enhance electoral purity, 26 May 1842. He opposed the issue of the Nottingham writ, 29 July 1842, wishing to see ‘more effectual means for purifying the borough’ adopted.
The other topics on which Yorke intervened were an eclectic mix and included allowing solicitors to offset the duty paid on their certificates against their income tax obligations, on which his motion was defeated by 18 votes to 183, 6 May 1842. He was in the minority for the university oaths abolition bill, 25 May 1843, when he observed that as a gentleman pensioner at Christ’s College, Cambridge, he had been able to purchase ‘immunity’ from daily attendance at chapel, which he felt exposed the lack of necessity for obligatory religious observances. He also took an interest in legislation on ecclesiastical courts, securing the defeat of the second reading of the court of arches bill by 17 votes to 30, 10 July 1844. He raised the case of Joseph Mason, transported to Norfolk Island after his conviction at York assizes, but subsequently pardoned, wishing to know when he would return home, 14 July 1845, and pursued this matter after presenting a petition from Mason’s wife, 19 and 20 Mar. 1846. When Mason finally arrived in England that May, he visited Yorke to express ‘his gratitude for his unwearied exertions on his behalf’.
Yorke regularly presented petitions and was active in the committee rooms. He was added to the select committee on health of towns, 19 Apr. 1842, which recommended legislation on burials within large towns, and was an assiduous questioner of witnesses to the inquiry on the operation of the Truck Acts.
Seeking re-election in 1847, Yorke and his supporters cited his assiduous attention to his parliamentary duties. He praised corn law repeal and noted that he had ‘done what he could’ to modify the poor law’s severity.
Having given notice before the dissolution that he would move for an address to the queen urging that the new Houses of Parliament be completed ‘without further delay’, Yorke spoke in support of Bernal Osborne’s amendment to the same effect, 2 Mar. 1848.
Yorke voted in the Commons for the last time on 11 May 1848, when he also visited the Reform Club, where he was observed to be ‘rather taciturn’ and ‘exhibited more eccentricity in his manners than was usual to him’.
