Valued by the leadership as a ‘good Tory’, Vyse was parachuted into the representation of Northamptonshire South in 1846, and represented the division for over a decade under a Protectionist mantle.
Vyse’s grandfather, Richard (1746-1825), and father, Richard William (1784-1853), had both enjoyed lengthy military careers and sat briefly in Parliament as nominees of the duke of Cumberland prior to 1820.
Vyse maintained an average level of attendance during his short first parliament, and voted consistently with his Protectionist colleagues. In the only known speech of his parliamentary career, 12 May 1846, he questioned the Peel ministry’s claim that their corn importation bill would alleviate Irish distress, which he contended ‘did not exist to the extent represented by the Government’. Reflecting his family’s continued connection to Buckinghamshire’s Conservative politics, as well as Vyse’s own ambition in the party, he was appointed in June 1847 as chairman of Disraeli’s successful 1847 Buckinghamshire election committee.
Vyse attended ninety-seven divisions during the first year of the subsequent parliament (the average was seventy) but thereafter his presence in the division lobby dipped below average. He presented several petitions – including two opposing the Jewish disabilities bill, 20 & 28 Mar. 1848 – and again voted consistently with his Protectionist colleagues, including with the group of hard-liners who opposed the sugar duties bill, 7 July 1848, and against reform of the navigation laws, 24 July 1851. He was re-elected at a nominal contest in 1852, where he pledged his support to the Derby government, spoke in favour of a new fixed duty on corn, and vowed to continue to ‘protect Native Industry from unfair competition with the untaxed Foreigner’ and ‘defend our Church against the attacks of a designing Roman Catholic Priesthood’.
Vyse’s attendance declined steadily thereafter, but he confirmed his Protectionist credentials during the Derby administration by acting as a teller for the minority that opposed Hume’s motion for a call of the house to discuss Villiers’ motion praising free trade, 19 Nov 1852, and by voting in the die-hard protectionist minority that opposed an amended version of Villiers’ motion praising free trade, 26 Nov. 1852. He divided with the Conservative whip whilst in opposition, including in support of the anti-Maynooth motions, 23 Feb. 1853, 15 Apr. 1856 and in support of Cobden’s censure motion on Canton, 3 Mar. 1857, having been listed by Disraeli as a Conservative who could be counted on to be present for the queen’s speech in January 1856 and show ‘that the great sources of the strength of the Conservative connection are united and cordial’.
Vyse polled third at the 1857 election, when the Conservatives were heavily outspent by the Liberal Viscount Althorp. He was accused by his fellow incumbent of playing party politics to vote against Palmerston over the Chinese war.
In October 1863 he was identified by local Conservatives as a possible candidate for the vacancy at New Windsor, his Buckinghamshire property sitting just across the county border. Vyse came forward as ‘an admirer and supporter’ of Derby, but renounced his previous support for protection to profess that ‘Free trade has been a great benefit to [the country]’ and informed electors that he was willing to accept some concession to the labouring classes over the franchise, due to ‘their abstinence and their good behaviour’.
His representation of New Windsor was short-lived, however, as he came bottom of the poll in 1865, when he was interrupted on the hustings by frequent jibes of ‘Go to Northampton’, ‘It is your last dying speech’, and ‘Shut up’. He confessed that he was ‘at a loss to know if there is any great political question at issue in this election’.
