A ‘constant attendant’ and ‘frequent speaker’ at Westminster, Collins, who sat for Knaresborough in this period, became a well-known character in the Commons.
Originally from Sussex, a branch of the Collins family had settled in Knaresborough, Yorkshire, in the seventeenth century.
The Collins family wielded some electoral influence at Knaresborough through their ownership of fields on which cow-sheds were erected and rented to voters to assist them in meeting the £10 franchise qualification.
Collins seized the opportunity to contest a vacancy at Knaresborough in July 1851, despite his relative youth. It was initially reported that he offered ‘on Church and State and Protectionist principles’,
Collins was sworn in, 21 July 1851. Coming from a clerical family, he took a ‘very active interest’ in church questions, and his maiden speech was on the Church Buildings Act amendment bill, 30 July.
When Collins sought re-election in 1852, there were conflicting reports about his political affiliation. While the Leeds Mercury identified him as ‘one of Lord Derby’s party’ who had reluctantly disavowed protection, The Standard described him as a Liberal Conservative.
Conservative registration gains, including additional ‘cow-house’ votes, meant that Collins’s prospects looked better in 1857.
His ‘awkward and ungainly’ appearance heightened by his ‘strikingly rustic hat and his invariable umbrella’, Collins became a notable figure at Westminster, where he was active in the chamber and committee-rooms.
Collins became best-known, however, as ‘the arch-interrupter’ of the Commons: ‘many a discourse, good, bad, and indifferent, has been sharply and suddenly cut off by him’.
The first major issue to concern Collins was parliamentary oaths. He objected to the fact that the oaths bills of 1857 and 1858, which aimed to settle the question of admitting Jews to Parliament, retained a separate oath for Catholics, 25 June 1857, 10 Feb. 1858, describing this as ‘the last rag of intolerance’, 22 Mar. 1858. Collins’s concerns about discrimination against Catholics may have had a personal dimension, as his brother Henry converted to Catholicism in 1857.
Collins demonstrated his interest in the conduct of elections with several brief interventions regarding constituencies where petitions had exposed corruption.
Collins’s most notable success was in securing additional representation for the West Riding when the seats stripped from Sudbury and St. Albans were redistributed in 1861. He first mooted the division of the West Riding into two constituencies returning two members each, 25 Feb., and spoke at length in support of granting two extra MPs to the West Riding (rather than the proposed one), 10 June 1861. A week later, he had the satisfaction of Palmerston endorsing his recommendation, after alternative plans to give representation to Kensington and Chelsea or a third member to Middlesex were rejected, 17 June. His persistence also paid off when it came to selecting Wakefield rather than Pontefract as the election town for the southern division of the West Riding, 1 and 8 July 1861.
Addressing a Conservative election meeting in 1865, Collins was critical of the Palmerston ministry’s actions regarding the Schleswig-Holstein question, arguing that ‘people should never bark unless they intended to bite’. He emphasised his commitment to maintaining the connection between Church and state. Declaring himself ‘tooth and nail’ opposed to household suffrage, he warned of the dangers of ‘Americanising’ British institutions.
Knaresborough was reduced to one seat by the Second Reform Act, and in 1868 Collins instead secured election for Boston, Lincolnshire, where he was defeated in 1874.
Having been ‘in indifferent health’ for eighteen months,
