A London banker whose family owned land in Herefordshire, Biddulph represented Hereford as a Reformer in two short parliaments in the 1830s. In 1837 he declared to electors, ‘I do not wish to form new institutions, but to strengthen old ones’, which reflected his Whiggish views, his support for the ballot notwithstanding.
Biddulph’s father John was a partner in the banking firm of Biddulph, Cocks and Co., of Charing Cross.
Biddulph offered for Hereford at the 1832 general election, emphasising his support for religious liberty, retrenchment and the abolition of slavery.
A silent member, who does not appear to have served on any committees after 1832, Biddulph’s voting behaviour in the first two sessions of the reformed Commons is difficult to discern as he rarely appears in the lists of surviving minorities. However, in 1833 he opposed currency reform, while supporting the ballot, and he divided against Hume’s motion for a fixed duty on corn, 7 Mar. 1834. His votes were evidently sufficient to justify his label as a ‘true, bold and consistent Reformer’ at the 1835 general election, when he stood his ground.
Elected in second place as a ‘firm supporter of the late administration’, Biddulph naturally sided with the Whig leadership in the key party votes on the address, speakership and the Irish church, 19, 26 Feb., 2 Apr. 1835. He continued to cast votes in favour of the ballot, if not other political reforms, as the intimidation he witnessed during his election campaign had reinforced his belief in its necessity to protect voters.
At the 1837 general election, when he was beaten by ten votes, Biddulph argued that the most important issues that needed to be addressed were Ireland and the established church. He favoured the national scheme of education outlined by the government and regretted that their scheme to replace church rates had been dropped.
After his father’s death in 1845, Biddulph took over as head of the family bank and inherited the Ledbury estate.
