First elected in 1809, Lester, whose father had represented Poole from 1801-7, continued to sit for the borough until 1835 on the interest of his prosperous mercantile family, the town’s leading Newfoundland traders, whose alliances invariably gave them the upper hand in the internecine party squabbles of Poole’s nominally Tory corporation. A convert to reform, whose ‘independent’ support for the Whig ministry of Lord Grey had assisted his case for the establishment of a Newfoundland legislative assembly, at the 1832 general election he topped the poll as a Liberal, the ‘majority of the new constituency’ having ‘determined to exericse their newly acquired right in favour of those who had advocated the reform bill through all its stages’.
A silent and apparently irregular attender in this period, described as ‘inclining to radical opinions’ in a parliamentary guide, Lester supported ministers on the address, 8 Feb. 1833, and the currency, 25 Apr. 1833, but was in Joseph Hume’s radical minorities for the abolition of sinecures, 15 Feb., 16 July 1833, and inquiry into the civil list, 5 May 1834.
It has been suggested that Lester subsequently moved abroad, and though eligible he did not vote in the highly contested Poole council election of December 1835.
