A native of county Durham, Shafto, who ‘had the strong and vigorous frame of the fine old English gentleman’, possessed an impeccable political pedigree.
At the 1832 general election Shafto offered as a Reformer for Durham South. His moderate stance on the established church won him the tacit support of the Conservative bishop of Durham, but, opposed by two popular local Reformers, he was defeated in third place.
Shafto’s parliamentary career, which spanned over two decades, was utterly unremarkable. Like his father and grandfather before him, he is not known to have made a single contribution to debate in the Commons, and his select committee service was also limited.
At the 1865 general election Shafto, who advised his constituents that ‘he was a man of few words, but at the same time he was honest and true’, comfortably saw off a Conservative challenger.
One historian has identified Shafto, along with Thomas Milner Gibson, Charles Villiers, Peter Locke King and Francis Henry Berkeley, as being part of a ‘small number of country gentlemen’ who represented ‘gentry radicalism’. ‘Intrepid in the House’, they formed an ‘earnest, able, hardworking fraternity’ who ‘influenced the course of social and political change’.
Following his retirement from Parliament Shafto played no further part in public life until April 1888 when he was the plaintiff in a law suit against the ecclesiastical commissioners who claimed, as successors in title to the bishops of Durham, the right to work the coal under their copyhold lands. Following a lengthy and prominent trial, Shafto won the case, with the judge granting injunctions to restrain the commissioners from mining the copyhold land.
