Dawkins’s father was a wealthy landowner and West India planter, but had a large family to support. Dawkins did not take to the legal profession, and when he eloped in 1788 Lord Herbert commented:
Sir Henry Clinton ... being in bad circumstances, can allow his daughter little or nothing and Dawkins having so very large a family cannot allow his son above £600 a year and neither of their dispositions seems much adapted to rigid economy.
Pembroke Pprs. 378.
The problem was met by Dawkins’s taking over his father’s Oxfordshire property.
In 1806 his wife’s cousin the 4th Duke of Newcastle brought Dawkins into Parliament. He made no mark there. On 2 Mar. 1807 he was a defaulter. He supported the Portland administration, his family being Portland’s friends.
Mr Dawkins is a man of an active mind and at the same time that he receives emolument from the situation, he is particularly desirous of being so employed as to entitle him fairly to receive that compensation for his endeavour to be useful, which certainly will be extremely serviceable to him.
His chief, Lord Glenbervie, described him in due course as a ‘worthy honest’ official.
Dawkins re-entered Parliament for another Newcastle borough in 1812, after an unsuccessful canvass at East Retford on the same interest.
