Parsons, a wealthy brewer, stood unsuccessfully on his family’s interest at Reigate in 1717, and again in 1722, when he was returned at Harwich. An extreme Tory, he received literature from the Jacobites overseas for distribution in the city of London. In March 1726 the Jacobite Duke of Wharton wrote to him, asking him to explain the differences between the Pretender and his wife to their friends in the city, adding:
The personal knowledge I have of your fidelity and capacity encourages me to write freely to you from this place, and I am sure I can give no greater proof of my dependence on your friendship than in trusting you with my life and fortune.
Your zeal for the King and the unwearied application with which you have through the whole course of your life studied his Majesty’s service and the good of your country have induced me to apply to you at this juncture ... The loyalty and affection of the city of London for the royal family are formidable to the King’s enemies, and therefore it is not to be doubted but that great pains have been taken to show this circumstance to them in such light as would alarm and surprise them.
Stuart mss 68/118; 91/63.
In 1727 he was returned for London, where he is described as being ‘universally beloved for his good nature and open behaviour, and very popular amongst the common people for his great affability and condescension’.
The owner of a ‘brilliant stable’,
Parsons took an active part in the opposition to Walpole’s excise bill both in the city and in Parliament, where he explained in a speech
some of the hardships which the brewers laboured under by being subject to the excise laws. He said his brother and Mr. Hucks knew what he said to be true and called upon them to declare what they knew, but they did not think proper to do it.
Stuart mss Box 1/125.
He moved that the city’s petition, praying to be heard by counsel against the bill, should be received and read.
