At the contested election of 1790, Neville retained his seat for Reading, where he had the support of the corporation and an interest deriving from his family’s wealth and Berkshire estates, and came in again without opposition in 1796. On 31 Oct. 1790 he observed to Lord Bulkeley that ‘those who abuse Pitt for secrecy and mystery show their own folly’;
In 1791 Neville applied to Pitt for the vacant lord lieutenancy of Berkshire, basing his pretensions, if the office were to be conferred on a commoner, ‘upon the belief that my family is the oldest in the county, and that the extent of our property in it is inferior only to that of Lord Craven’. Pitt had already recommended Lord Radnor, but he assured Neville that had the lieutenancy ‘been to go in the line of commoners there certainly could have been no one with stronger pretensions than yours, and no one whom on every account I should have had so much pleasure in proposing’. Privately, Neville expressed some disappointment.
For all this, Neville, though heart-broken by the recent death of his wife, forced himself to attend the House to vote against Fox’s peace amendment, 30 Dec. 1796, and was gratified to think that this ‘great effort’ had been recognized as such by Pitt.
As a peer Neville, who was later said to have pocketed some £120,000 from his colonial sinecure,
