The Newmans, prominent in Dartmouth life since about 1400, were pioneers of the Newfoundland-Portugal trade. By 1800 their business activities were extensive, embracing trade in fish from Newfoundland to Portugal and wine from Portugal to England, a shipping line and a fleet of licensed privateers based on Dartmouth. As well as land and fish factories in Newfoundland, they had warehouses and premises in Vianna do Castello and Oporto, where this Member’s father married and he himself was born. They later handled most of the supplies for Wellington’s army in the Peninsula.
Newman’s father, the only one of six brothers to leave issue, retired to Bath after his return from Portugal and left Newman an equal share with three siblings in three quarters of his estate.
Lord Mount Edgcumbe had evidently offered to find a seat for his ‘friend’ Newman in 1812 and was willing to return Lord Desart for Bossiney if ministers could accommodate Newman elsewhere. Hopes of Kilkenny or Cashel came to nothing and the project collapsed, but shortly after the general election Newman came in on a vacancy for Bletchingley on the Kenrick interest.
Before 1816 his only recorded votes, apart from the two on the Catholic question, were for the reduction of the paymasters’ salaries, 8 Mar. 1813, against the expulsion of Lord Cochrane, 5 July 1814, and for inquiry into the civil list, 14 Apr. and 8 May 1815. He took no part in the opposition to the renewal of war or the peace terms, but in his first known speech, 10 Apr. 1815, he supported inquiry into the ‘profuse expenditure’ of the commissariat, and from February 1816 he voted regularly against government in favour of economy, retrenchment and reduced taxation.
On 5 Mar. 1816 he presented a Dartmouth petition against the property tax (which he opposed later in the month) and also endorsed its calls for abolition of sinecures and for parliamentary reform. In December 1816, having earlier offered himself as a candidate for Exeter at the next general election and been joined in the field by a radical reformer, he publicly declared his support for any measure that would ‘tend to ameliorate the representation, and to relieve the burthens of public expenditure, without violating the principles of the constitution’. He was, he insisted, ‘wholly unattached to any party’.
At the general election of 1818 he stood for Exeter and came a comfortable second in the poll, although the corporation as a body was not well-disposed towards him. He continued to vote regularly with opposition in 1819 and divided with them in support of Tierney’s censure motion, 18 May. He spoke against the coal duties, 20 Feb., denied rumours that he had changed his mind on the Catholic question, 3 May, and voted for inquiry into Scottish burgh reform, 6 May. In the emergency session of 1819, he voted against government on the address, 24 Nov., and the state of the nation, 30 Nov., but his only recorded votes against the subsequent repressive legislation were on the seditious meetings bill, 2 and 6 Dec., and the sureties clause of the newspaper stamp duties bill, 20 Dec. He died 24 Jan. 1848.
