Beresford, a naval officer, and his brother William Carr Beresford†, a soldier who became 1st Viscount Beresford, were the illegitimate sons of the 2nd earl of Tyrone, who was created marquess of Waterford in 1789. Waterford never denied his paternity and assured John in 1795 that ‘Lady W., all the boys and girls, my brothers and every part of my family felt equal pleasure and gratification with me on your gallant conduct’, adding that ‘Carr and you ... have both behaved in your life in a manner to be a credit to me’. As late as 1827 Thomas Creevey* wrote that the brothers were
still in ignorance of who their mother was, or whether they had the same, but from the secrecy upon this head, from their being sent from Ireland, and above all, from Lady Waterford having seemed always to show more affection to them than her own children, there is a notion they were hers before her marriage.
N. Riding RO, Beresford mss 2BA/21/9; Creevey Pprs. ii. 127.
In 1820 Beresford was again returned for Coleraine by his legitimate brother, the 2nd marquess of Waterford.
He remained an active naval officer, commanding at Leith and in the West of Scotland, 1820-23. He was an occasional attender who continued to give general support, when present, to Lord Liverpool’s ministry. He voted in defence of their conduct towards Queen Caroline, 6 Feb. 1821. He divided against Catholic relief, 28 Feb. He voted against repeal of the additional malt duty, 3 Apr., and the disfranchisement of ordnance officials, 12 Apr. 1821. His only recorded vote in the following session was against relieving Catholic peers of their disabilities, 30 Apr. 1822. A vacancy at Berwick early in 1823 enabled Beresford’s family to exploit their recently acquired interest in the borough, and he came in without opposition. He divided against repeal of the Foreign Enlistment Act, 16 Apr., and inquiries into the prosecution of the Dublin Orange rioters, 22 Apr., and delays in chancery, 5 June 1823. There is no recorded parliamentary activity for 1824. He presented a Berwick petition against the coastwise coal duty, 19 May,
Beresford, who held the command at the Nore, 1830-33, was listed by ministers as one of their ‘friends’, and he duly voted with them in the crucial division on the civil list, 15 Nov. 1830. He divided against the second reading of the Grey ministry’s reform bill, 22 Mar., and for Gascoyne’s wrecking amendment, 19 Apr. 1831. He came in again for Northallerton at the ensuing general election. He voted against the second reading of the reintroduced reform bill, 6 July, and paired against its passage, 21 Sept. In the debate on the game bill, 8 Aug., he spoke against the granting of licences to beer sellers. Thereafter his attendance apparently lapsed: he was listed as having paired against the second reading of the revised reform bill, 17 Dec. 1831, and in February 1832 it was reported that he had ‘paired off for the session’.
With Northallerton partially disfranchised by the Reform Act, Beresford fell back on Coleraine, where he was returned at the general election of 1832, only to be unseated on petition. Peel secured his return for the government borough of Chatham in 1835 after appointing him to the admiralty board, but he retired in 1837.
