Penruddocke belonged to a leading Wiltshire gentry family, which had been settled at Compton Chamberlayne, ‘a commodious mansion, seated in a luxuriant part of the county’, since the sixteenth century, and he was a descendant of the royalist Colonel John Penruddocke, who was beheaded for treason at Exeter in 1655.
In 1818 Penruddocke again refused the honour of offering for the county, which he had declined in 1812 on the retirement of his idle relation, Henry Penruddocke Wyndham. Instead, at the general election that year he split for the sitting Member Paul Methuen† and the Tory interloper William Long Wellesley* against the agriculturist John Benett*, while at the by-election in 1819 he voted for the unsuccessful candidate John Dugdale Astley*, against Benett.
Penruddocke is laid up with the gout, but from what I hear he certainly will start for the county if there is a requisition sent to him, whenever there is another election, and really in the present uncertain aspect of affairs I think such a contingency by no means improbable at no very distant period ... All I hope is, we may all get over Her Majesty the queen with our lives and property safe.Wilts. RO, Ailesbury mss 9/35/100.
However, nothing ever came of his county aspirations. He attended a meeting of the local gentry in Salisbury, 30 Jan. 1821, which agreed a loyal address to the king.
In the House, where he made no known speeches during this period, he was an inconspicuous general supporter of the Liverpool ministry. He voted in defence of their conduct towards the queen, 6 Feb. 1821. As Lord Sidmouth, the home secretary, predicted to the Devizes Member Thomas Grimston Estcourt, 28 Feb., Penruddocke voted against Catholic relief that day.
He was returned unopposed for Wilton at the general election of 1826. He was granted one month’s sick leave, 7 Mar., and voted against the Penryn election bill, 7 June 1827. He paired against Catholic claims, 12 May, and voted with the Wellington ministry against reducing the salary of the lieutenant-general of the ordnance, 4 July 1828. In February 1829 he was listed by Planta, the patronage secretary, as ‘opposed to the principle’ of the ministry’s Catholic emancipation bill. He commented in a letter to Estcourt’s son Thomas Henry Bucknall Estcourt* that ‘I am not very well pleased with government on this occasion. As the Catholics have bullied them they will be more dissatisfied than ever unless they get all they possibly can’. He added that ‘I am now confined to the house as the cold weather has brought on the complaint in my leg’. In fear of their conduct being shackled, he raised a scruple against Members signing the Wiltshire anti-Catholic address, but he did in fact do so.
The 12th earl of Pembroke having had him returned at the general election later that year, he was listed by ministers among their ‘friends’, but he was absent from the division on the civil list, 15 Nov. 1830. He was granted leave for three weeks because of illness in his family, 23 Nov. 1830, and again, 7 Feb. 1831, as well as on the grounds of the ill health of a near relation (for two weeks), 25 Feb., and urgent private business (for one week), 14 Mar. These absences were probably all occasioned by the fatal illness of his wife, who died on 5 Apr. Penruddocke, who had refused to sign Lord Radnor’s requisition for a county meeting on parliamentary reform,
