Pares, the conventionally educated son of a Nonconformist Leicester hosiery manufacturer and banker, who evidently did not practise after his call to the bar, was returned unopposed for the borough in 1820, having ousted the corporation candidate in 1818. In his address he promised his continued ‘undeviating endeavours to protect ... liberties, and guard against every increase in the public burthens or improvident use of the public money’.
I am almost run off my legs by hard work and ... of the last 27 hours, 22 have been passed in the House of Commons. The truth is I am on ... [the Grantham] election committee ... Six or seven hours is the usual period of our confinement and when [to] this occupation of the morning, late night sittings in the House are added, it is difficult (if not impossible) to find time for one’s ordinary meals and rest.
But there were compensations, as when the committee unseated a ministerialist, 11 July, thus giving ‘a death blow to the influence of one of the corruptest corporations in the kingdom’. The Queen Caroline affair ‘engages all the attention of everybody’, he told his sister, 25 July 1820, but ‘of her innocence I am sorry to say not even the Whigs themselves seem to entertain very much strong conviction’. He joined in the parliamentary attack on ministers’ conduct towards her, but, curiously, did not vote for the opposition censure motion, 6 Feb. 1821. He approved making Leeds, proposed for enfranchisement in place of Grampound, a scot and lot borough, 2 Mar. He was twice granted six weeks’ leave to attend to urgent private business, 7, 14 May (he got married on the 19th), but was present to vote for parliamentary reform, 9 May 1821, as he subsequently did on 25 Apr., 3 June 1822, 24 Apr., 2 June 1823, 26 Feb. 1824, 27 Apr. 1826. He was an occasional voter for economy, retrenchment and reduced taxation in 1821 and continued to muster for significant divisions on these issues in 1822. He voted in condemnation of Sir Robert Wilson’s* dismissal from the army, 13 Feb. 1822, and observed that ‘such a manifest determination on the part of the Tory Members to support and whitewash all the acts of administration right or wrong indiscriminately, must speak volumes in favour of reform’. He voted for Catholic relief, 28 Feb. 1821, 1 Mar., 21 Apr. (when he thought Canning’s ‘capital’ speech did ‘more than justice to the liberal spirit of the times’), 10 May 1825. He divided for inquiry into the Irish government’s legal proceedings against the Dublin Orange rioters, 22 Apr. 1823, but
did not much like the company ... [since] the result may be the discomfiture of the more liberal half of the cabinet and a consequent triumph to the less liberal one ... I should not wonder if our late success against ministers is ... objected to as a convincing proof that the H. of C. is not so corrupt as we aver it to be.
He voted against the Irish insurrection bill, 24 June 1823, and for inquiry into the state of Ireland, 11 May 1824, but was reluctant to criticize the government’s Spanish policy and could not support Lord Nugent’s motion, 17 Feb. 1824. He presented petitions for the abolition of slavery, 9, 17 Mar. 1824,
Pares retired from Parliament at the dissolution in 1826, but did not relinquish his political interest. He supported the candidature of the reformer William Evans* at Leicester in 1826.
