John Jones, a Welsh-speaking ‘St. Peter’s boy’, whose politics were largely personal and frequently determined by local issues, was a leading advocate on the Carmarthen circuit and commanded political support in Cardiganshire, Carmarthenshire and Pembrokeshire. His father had been the agent for the Vaughan estate of Golden Grove, Carmarthenshire, bequeathed in 1804 to the Grenvillite 1st Baron Cawdor, and Jones had become mayor of Carmarthen on their Blue interest in 1809. Cawdor, however, refused to support his parliamentary ambitions and in 1812 and 1818 he had contested Carmarthen unsuccessfully on the rival Red interest of Lord Dynevor. Another West Wales Red, Sir John Owen*, had facilitated his election for Pembroke Boroughs on a vacancy in 1815, but in 1818 he had been obliged under a local arrangement to make way there for Cawdor’s nominee John Hensleigh Allen*.
Jones intervened readily in debate, but the Liverpool government could rarely be sure of his support, despite his professed allegiance to the new home secretary Peel. He presented Carmarthen’s petition against the Insolvent Debtors Act, 20 Feb. 1822, and criticized the government’s retrenchment measures as ‘insufficient to afford effectual relief to the agricultural interest’. He acknowledged that lower malt duties would assist barley growing areas, but claimed that greater benefit, particularly for the poor, would be derived from reductions in the duties on salt and leather, and urged ministers to heed the ‘sentiments of the country as they were expressed at county meetings ... except on the subject of parliamentary reform’.
Jones had sat on the 1817 select committee on the administration of justice in Wales and had sought since 1818 to legislate to reform the courts of great sessions, with a view to preventing their abolition, which the Blues now advocated. His remedial bill, which in 1820 he had entrusted to Charles Warren, had made no progress. A measure based on the 1817 and 1820-1 committee reports promoted by Cawdor (as Campbell had become) and Allen fared similarly, 23 May 1822. Jones agreed with them that the reports should be further considered and that Welsh judges should be appointed by the lord chancellor and barred from sitting in the Commons, and with Peel’s acquiescence, on the 30th he introduced his bill ‘to enlarge and extend the powers of the judges of the several courts of great sessions in Wales’, which was printed and held over.
On 16 Feb. 1824 Jones obtained leave to introduce his bill to extend the power of judges in Wales.
I am far from thinking that any claim on government exists on my part. The support I have given to their measures has been dictated by principle; and whatever may be the result of this or any other application on my behalf, will continue disinterested ... Your public conduct has pointed you out to me as a proper political guide, and as the only individual of His Majesty’s government who has had and who will most probably retain an influence over my vote. I have however written to Lord Liverpool and Mr. [Stephen Rumbold] Lushington* on this occasion.
Add 40364, f. 144.
He argued that to deny farmers and tenants access under the game laws to game on their land would be an ‘unwarrantable invasion’ of the rights of property, 1 Apr. He presented a petition against West Indian slavery from Milford Haven, 9 Apr., and others from Carmarthen for repeal of the window tax, 11 May, and in condemnation of the indictment in Demerara of the Methodist missionary John Smith, 26 May. Seren Gomer praised him for voting accordingly, 11 June.
Jones, according to a radical publication of 1825, ‘attended frequently and voted in general with government’.
Jones divided against Catholic relief, 6 Mar. 1827, and when Peel resigned rather than serve in the pro-Catholic Canning’s ministry, he wrote to offer him his support, but made it clear that he would not vote against repeal of the Test Acts, ‘as my own conviction as well as the wishes of the major part of my constituents incline me to support such repeal if the matter shall come before the House of Commons’.
When ... Mr. Canning became premier he refused an offer made to him (I believe a judge in India) feeling that he could not consistently with his political principles accept of employment under that government.
However, it proved ‘impossible to include the name of Mr. Jones in the recent arrangement’.
The patronage secretary Planta correctly observed in February 1829 that Jones remained opposed on principle to Catholic emancipation; but he also deprecated ‘the attempts which I know are made to obtain signatures to anti-Catholic petitions’, 4 Mar., and urged Members to
suspend their judgement, until they know what is the nature of the measure intended to be brought forward by ... ministers. When I see what a sudden and unexpected change has taken place in the highest quarters, I think we ought to give those persons credit for sincerity; and I must suppose that the change in their opinions has arisen from there being only a choice of evils.
He divided for emancipation, 6 Mar., giving what the anti-Catholic Carmarthen Journal of 17 Apr. described as a vote for Peel rather than the Catholics. Presenting Llanarthney’s hostile petition, 12 Mar., he said he could not support its prayer, although it was prepared fairly, for he had ‘made up my mind to vote in favour of the bill’, thinking it ‘more dangerous not to relieve Roman Catholics than to do so’.
The Whig lawyer Henry Brougham’s speech on 7 Feb. 1828 had vilified the Welsh courts, and their future had been referred to a commission and discussed in Cawdor’s pro-abolition Letter ... to Lord Chancellor Lyndhurst.
Ministers listed Jones among their ‘friends’ and he divided with them when they were brought down on the civil list, 15 Nov. 1830. At a Carmarthen meeting that month he challenged local abolitionists to prove the scriptural basis for opposition to West Indian slavery, but he nevertheless presented and endorsed many anti-slavery petitions from Carmarthenshire and Pembrokeshire between November 1830 and April 1831.
He presented Kidwelly’s petition to become a contributory of Carmarthen, 12 Sept., and divided for the passage of the reintroduced reform bill, 21 Sept., and the second reading of the Scottish reform bill, 23 Sept. 1831. He called for a new election writ for Pembrokeshire, 23, 26 Sept., and after it was issued received a fortnight’s leave on urgent private business, 28 Sept., which he spent canvassing for the successful candidate Owen, another convert to reform. The aftermath of the by-election for Jones, who was never one to avoid the fray, was a duel with the reform candidate Robert Fulke Greville at Tafarn Spite, where, according to the Cambrian, he ‘received Mr. Greville’s shot, and refusing to apologise, fired his pistol in the air’.
Borough elections in Carmarthen remained unruly and it was rumoured that Jones would stand for the county’s new second seat or that Hugh Owen Owen would make way for him in Pembroke Boroughs at the December 1832 general election. However, he contested the new Carmarthen and Llanelli constituency, where his surprise defeat by the Liberal William Henry Yelverton of Whitland Abbey was attributed to ‘the tyrannical conduct of the magistracy to George Thomas [jailed after the borough election disturbances] ... which united the tradesmen of the town against him, even those who never interfered before’.
