William Ord, whose parliamentary career spanned half a century, was a lifelong supporter of Whig principles and measures, who, according to the earl of Carlisle, exercised his parliamentary duties with ‘undeviating consistency and unassailable integrity’.
With Morpeth reduced to a single-member seat by the Reform Act, Ord contested Northumberland South at the 1832 general election. In a bitter contest, he was criticised for his son’s alleged links with the Northern Political Union, and his support of free trade was portrayed by his Conservative opponent as an attack on the agricultural interest. Calling for the abolition of slavery, Ord garnered significant support, but to the surprise of his friends and colleagues, he finished bottom of the poll.
Mirroring the partisan nature of his election campaign, Ord voted for Abercromby as speaker, 19 Feb. 1835, and divided with the opposition against the address, 26 Feb. 1835. A noted champion of religious liberties in the pre-Reform era, he divided with Lord John Russell on Irish church appropriation, 2 Apr. 1835, and continued to support Melbourne’s second administration thereafter. His son’s health failing, Ord did not campaign at the 1837 general election, but with his popularity remaining strong, he comfortably topped the poll. Maintaining an assiduous attendance, he backed Charles Villiers’ motion for the repeal of the corn laws, 15 Mar. 1838, voted for the cessation of slave apprenticeships, 20 Mar. 1838, and divided with the ministry on the poor law amendment bill, 26 Mar. 1841.
A passionate proponent of free trade, Ord used his nomination speech at the 1841 general election in Newcastle to argue that a ‘more liberal system of commerce’ was the best way to relieve the hardships in Ireland, and was returned without a contest.
At his nomination speech at the 1847 general election, Ord, who remained a popular local figure, lamented that no great principles were at stake, attacked the disorganised state of the Conservative opposition, and once again topped the poll.
Despite such lavish praise, Ord’s silence in debate meant that following his death, his parliamentary career was remembered as ‘most honourable’ but ‘not brilliant’.
