A prosperous provincial banker, Geach, a Liberal free trader, was an ‘authority’ on financial issues during his brief Commons career.
In 1826, aged eighteen, Geach, a native of Cornwall, was appointed to a clerkship at the Bank of England.
Although it was a joint-stock bank, in many respects the Midland was run more like a private bank, and Geach’s experience ‘enabled him to avoid the errors into which so many joint stock banks have fallen’.
Possessing great creative genius, great power of organisation, and considerable monetary and financial skill, he laid the foundation of the bank on a deep, sure, lasting principle.
Bankers’ Magazine (1867), xxvii. 933.
Geach’s ‘extraordinary’ business acumen was also evident in a series of shrewd investments.
Geach was also active in the public life of Birmingham. He was closely connected to the Birmingham MPs Joshua and William Scholefield, and actively campaigned for them at election time.
In April 1851 Geach successfully contested the Coventry by-election, with the backing of the National Parliamentary and Financial Reform Association (NPFRA). He declared support for free trade, but distinguished himself from his Liberal opponent by endorsing radical political reform.
At Westminster, Geach was generally associated with radicals who advocated financial and political reform, many of whom had commercial or manufacturing backgrounds. On one occasion he expressed the view that government should be more business-like: [I]n almost all the Government offices there were people holding permanent appointments who were obstructive of anything like improvement; and it required a Committee of that House, composed of persons who were accustomed to business … to do anything effectual.
Geach supported Gladstone’s financial policy, the abolition of the ‘knowledge taxes’ and measures extending free trade, a notable exception being his vote against Joseph Hume’s motion to repeal the remaining protective duties on imports, 3 Mar. 1853.
Geach ‘was not a fluent speaker … but, as he never spoke except on topics with which he was perfectly familiar, he was listened to with … respect and attention’.
He resisted proposed regulations which would impose more costs on railway companies, and thought it ‘desirable’ that MPs with railway interests be represented on relevant select committees.
Exhausted by his parliamentary and commercial responsibilities and suffering from ‘intermittent diarrhoea’, Geach suffered an ‘internal disorder’ whilst recuperating in Scotland in autumn 1854, which caused his left leg to become ‘ulcerated’.
