A native of Oldham, Hibbert was the eldest son of Elijah Hibbert, co-founder of the town’s largest engineering establishment, Hibbert and Platt, which produced machinery for the cotton industry.
Incorrectly identified by Stenton and McCalmont as a candidate for Cambridge in 1857, Hibbert’s first attempt to enter Parliament was in fact for his native borough in 1859.
Arriving in the Commons during the cotton famine, Hibbert made his maiden speech the day after taking his seat, appealing for the suspension of the labour test in the Lancashire cotton districts.
A committed supporter of electoral reform, who was singled out for praise by Sir John Trelawny for his speech on Locke King’s county franchise bill, 13 Apr. 1864, Hibbert played a prominent part in the debates on the Second Reform Act.
Hibbert did, however, secure other significant alterations to the Second Reform Act, notably a clause whereby payment for the conveyance of voters to the poll – which ‘afforded a great opening to bribery and corruption’ – became illegal in boroughs.
Hibbert’s advanced Liberalism was also shown by his support for Stansfield’s motion to reduce government expenditure, 3 June 1862, voting in the minority of 63. Having told Oldham’s electors in 1859 that ‘it was not right that our national defences should be made an excuse for national extravagance’, he voted against the second reading of the fortifications (provision for expenses) bill, 30 June 1862.
A diligent parliamentarian, Hibbert served on a plethora of select committees, beginning with that on the tramways bill soon after his arrival in the House.
Disraeli was exaggerating for effect when he asserted that Hibbert was ‘looked on with feelings of adoration in the densely-populated manufacturing districts’, but he was nonetheless a well-regarded constituency MP.
Hibbert’s obituary in The Times described him as having ‘that business capacity without which the subordinate, but not unimportant, offices in a Ministry cannot be creditably filled’ and he held a succession of such posts after 1868, being rewarded with a knighthood in 1893. Although he was not eminent, ‘for he lacked the gifts of oratory and audacity that bring men to the front’, he was ‘one of the most loyal and useful members of the Liberal party’ during his lengthy parliamentary career.
