Lord Charlemont, it was recorded in 1781, ‘opposes, and will always do so’.
His electoral interest was not of itself sufficient to secure his return and in 1807 he retired in the face of a combination of other interests against him, stating that he had supported the Grenville ministry on all but one important issue which, as he favoured the abolition of the slave trade, was probably the Catholic question. Assize duties had been his pretext for absence from the divisions on it in April.
In 1818 he was defeated by a combination of proprietary strength and anti-Catholic feeling, but was returned in 1820 and 1826. The latter election was fought almost exclusively on the Catholic question and at a celebration dinner Caulfeild spoke in favour of ‘a perfect equalization of civil rights’, but did so ‘under great embarrassment ... labouring as he did under a constitutional unfitness for public speaking’.
