Honywood, who had joined the Whig Club on 8 Nov. 1784, survived another contest for Kent in 1790. He had inherited a better interest in Essex, where he was instrumental in facilitating the compromise between John Strutt and Charles Callis Western at Maldon at the same election.
On 21 Jan. and 18 Feb. 1794 he supported Fox’s amendment to the address in favour of peace and his motion for better convoy protection for the merchant navy. He was prepared to support home defence arrangements, 26 Mar., and thought that the county meetings to that end would remove constitutional difficulties about voluntary subscriptions for defence; but to prevent the appearance of disagreement with Fox’s friends he five days later explained himself: he was prepared to support Pitt’s volunteer regulation bill, but not the raising of men by government decree without parliamentary authorization. Next day, too, he justified some critical remarks he had made on 26 Mar. about the opening of postal correspondence by Kent magistrates hunting for evidence of sedition, which he thought unwarranted in a loyal county. He voted for a peace bid, 30 May 1794 and 29 Oct. 1795. On 20 Nov. 1795 he presented the Rochester petition against the King’s safety and seditious meetings bills and on 23 Nov. the Canterbury one, emphasizing that both were respectably signed: ‘If you pen up the humours of the body politic, God knows how soon it may gush out; and, whenever it does, great will be the deluge occasioned thereby’. He called on ministers to restore peace and regain the affections of the people. On 27 Nov. he presented another such petition from Hythe. He voted for peace negotiation, 15 Feb., and a few days later presented, at the levee, the Kent petition for peace signed by 15,339 persons.
Honywood, who could ill afford a further contest for the county, was narrowly defeated in 1796. The state of his health limited his personal efforts; in view of his financial sacrifices, Fox encouraged a subscription to cover his petition, which failed. He took his leave of the county, 6 May 1797, wishing only to live to see ‘our violated constitution’ restored.
