Manwood owed his return for Sandwich to his family’s standing, and in particular to his younger brother Roger, the town’s recorder. Once before, in December 1557, the brothers had stood for election together, but John, though chosen by Sandwich, had been replaced by a nominee of the lord warden. In 1571 Roger Manwood wrote to the town on his brother’s behalf, believing, according to his later statement, that the warden had given his consent. Finding that he was mistaken, and that Cobham had intended the second seat for John Vaughan, he deferred to Cobham, but the corporation maintained that they must have one resident freeman, ‘sworn to our liberties’, and in the end returned both Manwoods. The town books have an entry about the election: ‘5 March, John Manwood, jurat’. No other name is mentioned and no information about any parliamentary activity has been found, unless he and not Roger (who is probably meant) was the ‘Mr. Manwood’ who sat on the committee for griefs and petitions on 7 Apr. 1571. He probably died in the same year, soon after the end of the Parliament, though his will, made 15 June 1571, was not proved until April 1574. He left one third of his property to his wife, one third to his sons Thomas, Roger and John, and the remainder to his six ‘natural children’, i.e. those by his third wife. If anything in the will should be ‘badly expressed’, his brother was to have power to amend it. The executors were the widow and her stepsons Thomas and Roger.
biography text
Volume
Parlimentarian
Parliamentarian
53811
